Assimilation and individual differences in emotion: The dynamics of anger and approach motivation

Individuals who cross cultural boundaries face many challenges when trying to adapt to a receiving culture. Adaptation challenges such as learning to maneuver across societal domains may become increasingly complex if structural level factors such as discrimination are present. Researchers have conceptualized acculturation as a relatively autonomous decision indicating that four acculturation strategies exist: assimilation, separation, integration, and marginalization. Moreover, researchers have also long debated the link between acculturation strategy, adaptation hassles and negative health outcomes. However, models seeking to explain how individual difference and structural level variables may influence each other and subsequently influence acculturation and adaptation are needed. The purpose of this study is to lay the foundation for the conceptualization of such a model. We propose that temperamental predispositions to negative emotionality, anger, and impulsivity may highlight discrimination which in turn may lead to increases in acculturative stress and negative markers of psychosocial well-being. We used SEM to test our hypothesized model. Results supported a modified model. Implications for the measurement of adaptation and design of interventions are discussed.

Research highlights▶ Past research has conceptualized acculturation as a relatively autonomous decision. ▶ We conceptualized acculturation as a decision influenced by individual difference factors. ▶ We studied the influence of affect and behavior regulation. ▶ Factors that impinge adaptation, such as discrimination, were also included. ▶ Interactional relationships which led to an aversive acculturation experience were identified.