کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
955692 1476123 2015 14 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Legislative responses to wrongful conviction: Do partisan principals and advocacy efforts influence state-level criminal justice policy?
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
پاسخ های قانونی به اعتقادات نادرست: آیا مدافعان حزب و تلاش های تبلیغاتی بر سیاست عدالت کیفری در سطح دولت تاثیر می گذارند؟
کلمات کلیدی
اعتقادات غلط؛ تغییر قانونی؛ گروه های مورد علاقه؛ سیاست های حزبی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی روانشناسی روانشناسی اجتماعی
چکیده انگلیسی


• We examine state differences in wrongful conviction laws.
• States with more Innocence Network organizations have more of these laws.
• Conservative political ideology is associated with a lower likelihood of some laws.

The number of discovered wrongful criminal convictions (and resulting exonerations) has increased over the past decade. These cases erode public confidence in the criminal justice system and trust in the rule of law. Many states have adopted laws that aim to reduce system errors but no study has examined why some states appear more willing to provide due process protections against wrongful convictions than others. Findings from regression estimates suggest that states with a Republican controlled legislature or more Republican voters are less likely to pass these laws while the presence of advocacy organizations that are part of the ‘innocence movement’ make legislative change more likely. We thus identify important differences in the political and social context between U.S. states that influence the adoption of criminal justice policies.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Social Science Research - Volume 52, July 2015, Pages 147–160
نویسندگان
, ,