کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
961687 | 929896 | 2008 | 15 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Mad cows, terrorism and junk food: Should public policy reflect perceived or objective risks?
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت
پزشکی و دندانپزشکی
سیاست های بهداشت و سلامت عمومی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله

چکیده انگلیسی
Empirical evidence suggests that people's risk-perceptions are often systematically biased. This paper develops a simple framework to analyse public policy when this is the case. Expected utility (well-being) is shown to depend on both objective and perceived risks (beliefs). The latter are important because of the fear associated with the risk and as a basis for corrective taxation and second-best adjustments. Optimality rules for public provision of risk-reducing investments, “internality-correcting” taxation (e.g. fat taxes) and provision of costly information to reduce people's risk-perception bias are presented.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Health Economics - Volume 27, Issue 2, March 2008, Pages 234-248
Journal: Journal of Health Economics - Volume 27, Issue 2, March 2008, Pages 234-248
نویسندگان
Olof Johansson-Stenman,