Social responses to wind energy development in Ontario: The influence of health risk perceptions and associated concerns

• We analyze health risk perception-based responses to wind energy development.
• Health risks concerns are a major driver of public resistance to wind energy.
• Perceptions of injustices strongly fuel resistance to wind energy on health grounds.
• Acceptance of turbines does not imply successful coexistence with turbines.
• Using financial benefits to promote social acceptance could be problematic.

This study documents and analyzes the role of health risk perceptions and other associated concerns of wind energy development (henceforth WED) in Ontario. Drawing on the risk society framework, we conduct a longitudinal media content analysis to document and analyze perceptions of and responses to WED over a nine year period. Attention is paid to temporal variations in responses relative to Ontario׳s Green Energy Act (2009) (henceforth GEA); legislation aimed at the rapid expansion of renewable energy. The study reveals that the most radical forms of resistance to WED on health grounds are driven by perceived injustices in the treatment of potential at-risk citizens and citizens with health concerns. The GEA is fuelling these perceptions of injustices in subtle and nuanced ways, particularly by acting as a major confounder to health risk concerns. Contrary to several existing studies, we problematize the use of financial incentives to foster the development of wind energy. We also provide policy recommendations which include the need for increased public engagement in the WED process, the importance of using third party health and environmental assessments to inform developments as well as the need for post-development strategies to address ongoing community concerns.