کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
993367 936033 2011 11 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Antagonistic bioenergies: Technological divergence of the ethanol industry in Brazil
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی انرژی مهندسی انرژی و فناوری های برق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Antagonistic bioenergies: Technological divergence of the ethanol industry in Brazil
چکیده انگلیسی

We present evidence for the coexistence of two antagonistic sugarcane ethanol production technologies in Brazil, with the Southeast region of the country having relatively mechanized production processes, and the Northeast area using labor-intensive ones. We highlight the main differences between the hand-production and fully automated mechanical manufacturing in the Brazilian ethanol industry and examine the historical, political, and economic factors that induced this regional technology gap that is currently observed. We then construct an environmental model based on a 375-industry interregional input–output system for the Brazilian regions, in order to determine the extent to which the primitive ethanol production of Northern Brazil differs from the automated manufacture technologies of the South in terms of greenhouse gas emissions. We show that ethanol produced with modern technologies generates lower carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions than ethanol produced with traditional production processes. We also demonstrate that ethanol, regardless of the technology with which it was produced, is more carbon-efficient than petrochemical products.

Research Highlights
► The ethanol industry in Brazil exhibits major regional technological differences.
► Traditional ethanol production processes are more polluting than mechanized ones.
► The lowest carbon-intensity for an ethanol sector is found in the southeast region.
► Ethanol explains less than 1% of the land-transport sector's carbon-intensity.
► Ethanol is less polluting than natural gas, oil by-products and electricity.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Energy Policy - Volume 39, Issue 11, November 2011, Pages 6951–6961
نویسندگان
, ,