کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
993520 | 936038 | 2011 | 10 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: China's spent nuclear fuel management: Current practices and future strategies China's spent nuclear fuel management: Current practices and future strategies](/preview/png/993520.png)
Although China's nuclear power industry is relatively young and the management of its spent nuclear fuel is not yet a concern, China's commitment to nuclear energy and its rapid pace of development require detailed analyses of its future spent fuel management policies. The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of China's fuel cycle program and its reprocessing policy, and to suggest strategies for managing its future fuel cycle program. The study is broken into four sections. The first reviews China's current nuclear fuel cycle program and facilities. The second discusses China's current spent fuel management methods and the storage capability of China's 13 operational nuclear power plants. The third estimates China's total accumulated spent fuel, its required spent fuel storage from present day until 2035, when China expects its first commercialized fast neutron reactors to be operational, and its likely demand for uranium resources. The fourth examines several spent fuel management scenarios for the present period up until 2035; the financial cost and proliferation risk of each scenario is evaluated. The study concludes that China can and should maintain a reprocessing operation to meet its R&D activities before its fast reactor program is further developed.
► This study provides an overview of China's fuel cycle program and its reprocessing policy.
► This study suggests strategies for managing its future fuel cycle program.
► China will experience no pressure to lessen the burden of spent fuel storage in the next 30 years.
► China should maintain sufficient reprocessing operations to meet its demands for R&D activities.
► China should actively invest on R&D activities of both fuel cycling and fast reactor programs.
Journal: Energy Policy - Volume 39, Issue 7, July 2011, Pages 4360–4369