کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
9951969 | 1434797 | 2018 | 42 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Understanding and evaluating the SAS® EVAAS® Univariate Response Model (URM) for measuring teacher effectiveness
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی
اقتصاد، اقتصادسنجی و امور مالی
اقتصاد و اقتصادسنجی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Understanding and evaluating the SAS® EVAAS® Univariate Response Model (URM) for measuring teacher effectiveness Understanding and evaluating the SAS® EVAAS® Univariate Response Model (URM) for measuring teacher effectiveness](/preview/png/9951969.png)
چکیده انگلیسی
Despite little attention or exposure in the evaluation literature, the two SAS® EVAAS®models for estimating teacher effectiveness are used by several states and districts, in some cases for high stakes policies regarding teacher tenure, retention, or incentive pay. The EVAAS approach involves using one of two distinct models, the Multivariate Response Model (MRM) or the Univariate Response Model (URM). In this paper, we discuss and illustrate advantages and disadvantages of the EVAAS URM relative to the other widely used and studied value-added methods. We perform simulations to evaluate their ability to uncover true teacher effects under various teacher assignment scenarios. We also use administrative data to illustrate the extent of agreement between the URM and other common value-added approaches. Although the differences are small in our administrative data, we show with theory and simulations that standard linear regression using OLS often performs at least as well as-and sometimes better than-the more complicated EVAAS URM.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Economics of Education Review - Volume 66, October 2018, Pages 191-205
Journal: Economics of Education Review - Volume 66, October 2018, Pages 191-205
نویسندگان
Kelly N. Vosters, Cassandra M. Guarino, Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,