کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
10504054 | 946402 | 2005 | 14 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Direct or indirect? Assessing two approaches to the measurement of strategic voting
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم انسانی و اجتماعی
علوم اجتماعی
جغرافیا، برنامه ریزی و توسعه
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
چکیده انگلیسی
This paper fits into a growing literature about the conceptualisation and measurement of strategic voting. Here we compare the results obtained by applying a 'direct' method of measurement based on respondents' reported preferences and behavior with those produced by an 'indirect' method that relies on modeling the voting act in both the absence and presence of variables about the parties' chances of winning. Our data are derived from a three-party contest in an single-member plurality system, the 1999 election in the province of Ontario. We find that the two methods converge closely in predicting the aggregate amount of strategic voting, a surprisingly low 4-6%. The direct method, however, is more useful when it comes to identifying which particular individuals did and did not vote strategically.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Electoral Studies - Volume 24, Issue 2, June 2005, Pages 163-176
Journal: Electoral Studies - Volume 24, Issue 2, June 2005, Pages 163-176
نویسندگان
André Blais, Robert Young, Martin Turcotte,