کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1054953 | 946864 | 2011 | 12 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

There is widespread acceptance regarding the need to transition towards more sustainable urban water practices. Supporting such a transition requires new governance frameworks that can accommodate complexity and uncertainty, and organisational cultures that embrace experimentation and learning. This empirically focused research paper examines how eleven, alternative local-scale experiments were initiated while operating in an unsympathetic regime. Furthermore, the perceptions of more than 150 urban water practitioners across Australia are presented, regarding the importance of and difficulty in undertaking experimentation in the urban water sector, and the necessary mechanisms for influencing a step change to sustainable urban water management practices. Interviewees revealed perceived limitations in experimenting with new technologies and practices when operating within a hierarchical and market-based governance paradigm. Also, industry conservatism and the dominant risk-based management approach both operate as significant constraints to promoting an experimentation culture, and are closely related to concerns about public health and financial implications. Overall, the research highlights the Australian urban water sector is willing to embrace learning-by-doing; however, a stronger emphasis on promoting an organisational and industry-wide culture of experimentation and learning is required. Policy implications for future water governance are discussed.
Research highlights
► Challenges in upscaling alternative local-scale urban water practices were examined.
► Interviewed practitioners revealed tensions between local and regime scales.
► Industry conservatism and neoliberal fiscal policies were perceived to inhibit change.
► Current governance paradigms reinforce the status quo.
► A transition requires cultural and structural reforms to support experimentation.
Journal: Global Environmental Change - Volume 21, Issue 2, May 2011, Pages 721–732