کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1082963 | 950977 | 2011 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

ObjectiveFamily practitioner diagnostic labels applied in consultation provide a signpost for treatment and management. Yet, it is unknown whether each label reflects the health of the respective patient group.Study Design and SettingConsultation records of 7,799 patients aged 50 years and older from six family practices were linked to a cross-sectional baseline health survey. Associations between six mutually exclusive cardiovascular disease and nine mutually exclusive musculoskeletal disorder categories, and physical health severity as measured by the Short Form-12 questionnaire were examined.ResultsThere were 2,447 (31.4%) cardiovascular disease and 3,321 (42.6%) musculoskeletal disorder consulters. The mean physical health scores ranged from 38.38 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 37.8–39.0) for hypertension to the poorest score of health 28.98 (95% CI: 27.5–30.5) for consulters with heart failure, whereas in the musculoskeletal disorder group, scores ranged from 44.85 (95% CI: 42.2–47.5) for soft tissue disorder to 28.79 (95% CI: 26.8–30.8) for consulters with inflammatory polyarthropathy (trend P < 0.001). This trend in the association between diagnostic categories and physical health severity within both spectrums remained after adjustment for confounders.ConclusionSpecific diagnostic labels for selected chronic illness indicate the severity of physical health for the corresponding consulting population.
Journal: Journal of Clinical Epidemiology - Volume 64, Issue 5, May 2011, Pages 547–555