کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
10976446 | 1108041 | 2015 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of rumination activity measured using rumination collars against direct visual observations and analysis of video recordings of dairy cows in commercial farm environments
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مقایسه میزان فعالیت نشخوارکنندگان با استفاده از کوره های شفیره در برابر مشاهدات بصری مستقیم و تجزیه و تحلیل ضبط تصاویر گاوهای لبنی در محیط های مزرعه ای تجاری
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
گاو شیری، فعالیت روزمره اعتبار سنجی، ضبط ویدئو، مشاهده مستقیم،
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری
علوم کشاورزی و بیولوژیک
علوم دامی و جانورشناسی
چکیده انگلیسی
Automated systems for monitoring the behavior of cows have become increasingly important for management routines and for monitoring health and welfare. In the past few decades, various devices that record rumination have been developed. The aim of the present study was to compare rumination activity measured with a commercially available rumination collar (RC) against that obtained by direct visual observations and analysis of video recordings in commercial dairy cows. Rumination time from video recordings was recorded by a trained observer. To assess observer reliability, data were recorded twice, and the duration of recorded behaviors was very similar and highly correlated between these 2 measurements (mean = 39 ± 4 and 38 ± 4 min/2 h). Measurements of rumination time obtained with RC when compared with analysis of video recordings and direct observations were variable: RC output was significantly positively related to observed rumination activity when dealing with animals housed indoors (trial 1 video recordings: slope = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.92-1.12), and the limits of agreement method (LoA) showed differences (in min per 2-h block) to be within â26.92 lower and 24.27 upper limits. Trial 1 direct observations: slope = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.62-1.55, and the LoA showed differences to be within â28.54 lower and 21.98 upper limits. Trial 2: slope = 0.93, 95% CI = 0.64-1.23, and the LoA showed differences to be within â32.56 lower and 19.84 upper limits. However, the results were poor when cows were outside grazing grass (trial 3: slope = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.13-1.02, and the LoA showed differences to be within wider limits â51.16 lower and 53.02 upper). Our results suggest that RC can determine rumination activity and are an alternative to visual observations when animals are housed indoors. However, they are not an alternative to direct observations with grazing animals on pasture and its use is not advisable until further research and validation are carried out.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of Dairy Science - Volume 98, Issue 3, March 2015, Pages 1750-1758
Journal: Journal of Dairy Science - Volume 98, Issue 3, March 2015, Pages 1750-1758
نویسندگان
V. Ambriz-Vilchis, N.S. Jessop, R.H. Fawcett, D.J. Shaw, A.I. Macrae,