Comparisons of the influenza virus A M2 channel binding affinities, anti-influenza virus potencies and NMDA antagonistic activities of 2-alkyl-2-aminoadamantanes and analogues

The new 2-alkyl-2-aminoadamantanes and analogues 4–10 were designed and synthesized by simplification of the structure of the potent anti-influenza virus A spiranic aminoadamantane heterocycles 2 and 3. The aim of the present work was to examine the effects of bulky and extended lipophilic moieties attached to amantadine 1 on binding to the M2 channel and the resulting antiviral potency. The binding affinities of the compounds to the M2 protein of influenza virus A/chicken/Germany/27 (Weybridge strain; H7N7) were measured for the first time using an assay based on quenching of Trp-41 fluorescence by His-37 protonation, and their antiviral potencies were evaluated against the replication of influenza virus A H2N2 and H3N2 subtypes and influenza virus B in MDCK cells. Of the various 2-alkyl-2-aminoadamantanes, and analogues, spiro[piperidine-2,2′-adamantane] 3 had the strongest M2 binding and antiviral potency, which were similar those of amantadine 1. The relative binding affinities suggested that the rigid carbon framework provided by the pyrrolidine or piperidine rings results in a more favorable orientation inside the M2 channel pore as compared to large, freely rotating alkyl groups. The aminoadamantane derivatives exhibited similar NMDA antagonistic activity to amantadine 1. A striking finding was the antiviral activity of the adamantanols 4, and 6, which lack any NMDA antagonist activity.

The M2 binding affinities, anti-influenza virus potencies and NMDA antagonist activities of some aminoadamantane derivatives and analogues were evaluated. The data can be used for mapping the influenza virus A M2 channel lipophilic pocket. Some important lead structures for drug design purposes emerged.Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide