کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1481834 | 991545 | 2011 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

The fractional Stokes–Einstein relation postulates a direct relationship between conductivity and shear flow. Like viscosity, the electrical resistivity of a glass-forming liquid exhibits a non-Arrhenius scaling with temperature. However, while both viscosity and resistivity are non-Arrhenius, here we show that these two properties follow distinct functional forms. Through analysis of 821 unique silicate liquids, we show that viscosity is best represented using the Mauro–Yue–Ellison–Gupta–Allan (MYEGA) model, whereas the resistivity of the same compositions more closely follows the Avramov–Milchev (AM) equation. Our results point to two fundamentally different mechanisms governing viscous flow and conductivity and therefore cast doubt on the general validity of the fractional Stokes–Einstein relation.
► The fractional Stokes–Einstein relation breaks down for silicate liquids.
► Viscosity and resistivity follow two distinct functional forms.
► Viscosity is governed by cooperative flow.
► Resistivity is controlled by localized hopping.
Journal: Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids - Volume 357, Issue 24, December 2011, Pages 3924–3927