کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1488716 | 992294 | 2013 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

Refractive indices of In2O3, In2−xSnxO3, InBO3 and 2 different gahnite crystals (Zn0.95Fe0.05Al2O4 and Zn0.91Mg0.04Mn0.03Fe0.03Al1.99Fe0.01O4) were measured at wavelengths of 435.8–643.8 nm and were used to calculate n (nD) at λ = 589.3 nm and (n∞) at λ = ∞ with the one-term Sellmeier equation 1/(n2 − 1) = −A/λ2 + B. Total polarizabilities, αtotal, were calculated from n∞ and the Lorenz–Lorentz equation. Refractive indices, nD and dispersion values, A, are, respectively, 2.093 and 133 × 10−16 m2 for In2O3; 2.0755 and 138 × 10−16 m2 for In2−xSnxO3; 1.7995 and 56 × 10−16 m2 for Zn0.95Fe0.05Al2O4; 1.7940 and 57 × 10−16 m2 for Zn0.91Mg0.04Mn0.03Fe0.03Al1.99Fe0.01O4 and no = 1.8782 and ne = 1.7756 and 〈63〉 × 10−16 m2 for InBO3. The lack of consistency of the polarizabilities of Zn2+ in ZnO and In3+ in In2O3 with the Zn2+ and In3+ polarizabilities in other Zn- and In-containing compounds is correlated with structural strain and very high dispersion of ZnO and In2O3.
Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slideHighlights
► Refractive indices of In2O3, In2−xSnxO3, InBO3 and gahnite crystals were measured.
► Total polarizabilities, αtotal, were calculated from n∞ and the Lorenz–Lorentz equation.
► The lack of consistency of the polarizabilities of Zn2+ and In3+ is explained.
Journal: Materials Research Bulletin - Volume 48, Issue 6, June 2013, Pages 2240–2243