کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1489259 | 992302 | 2013 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

• Stress vs. strain curve of 50.75Ni–49.25Ti (at%) is obtained at a high strain rate of 600 (1/s).
• Stress vs. strain curve of 49.5Ni–50.5Ti (at%) is obtained at a high strain rate of 600 (1/s).
• 50.75Ni–49.25Ti (at%) alloy exhibits a much higher stress level than 49.5Ni–50.5Ti (at%).
• Temperature increment on the surface of the specimen is about 3–5 °C for both alloys.
Stress vs. strain curves of two kinds of Ti–Ni shape memory alloys under dynamic compressive loading condition were obtained by the split Hopkinson pressure bar experiment. One is Ni-rich, 50.75Ni–49.25Ti (at%), alloy and the other is Ti-rich, 49.5Ni–50.5Ti (at%). The former exists as austenite phase to show superelastic behavior at the room temperature, and the latter is martensitic phase at the room temperature. The dynamic stress–strain curves were compared with quasi-static compressive test results. The Ni-rich specimen displayed a much higher stress level at the high strain rate than at the quasi-static test, but the Ti-rich specimen exhibited a stress level alike in the two types of tests. Temperature measurement on the surface of the impact specimens was carried out during the impact test. The temperature rising was about 3–5 °C in the considered test conditions.
Figure optionsDownload as PowerPoint slide
Journal: Materials Research Bulletin - Volume 48, Issue 12, December 2013, Pages 5121–5124