Reinvestigation of the tensile strength and fracture property of Ni(1 1 1)/α-Al2O3(0 0 0 1) interfaces by first-principle calculations

First-principle calculations are performed to reinvestigate the mechanical tensile property and failure characteristic of Ni/Al2O3 interfaces, in order to clear the inconsistence existed in the literatures. Four types of interface models without initial lateral stresses are used, i.e., Al-terminated O-site, O-terminated Al-site, Al-terminated Al-site and Al-terminated H-site models. Two kinds of tensile methods, viz., uniaxial extension and uniaxial tension, are adopted to check the mechanical responses of these interface models. It is found that the results under uniaxial extension are generally consistent with those under uniaxial tension, including the overall shapes of stress–strain curves and the values of tensile strengths. Moreover, the initial lateral stresses have an apparent influence on the mechanical properties of the interfaces during the loading process, such as tensile strength, fracture strain and the work of separation. Our simulation results also clarified that, under tensile loading, the most stable O-terminated Al-site interface model tends to fracture in a brittle way along the sublayer between in-plane Ni–Ni atomic bonds, while all of the Al-terminated interface models will fail in a ductile fracture manner with relatively lower stress levels, breaking along the interlayer between the Ni(1) and Al(1) layers.

Research highlightsNovel Ni(1 1 1)/α-Al2O3(0 0 0 1) interface models without initial lateral stresses are used. Lateral stresses remarkably influence the mechanical properties of the interfaces. Truly uniaxial tension is a requisite for study mechanical properties of interfaces. Some inconsistencies on failure behavior of Ni/Al2O3 interface are clarified.