کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1710851 | 1519517 | 2016 | 14 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• Methods of assessing operations, in relation to the field readiness, are described.
• Spring and autumn operations are assessed.
• Criteria under which operations can be defined sustainable are offered.
• 93 farmers have their execution of operations assessed.
Planning agricultural operations requires an understanding of when fields are ready for operations. However determining a field's readiness is a difficult process that can involve large amounts of data and an experienced farm manager. A consequence of this is that operations are often executed when fields are unready, or partially unready, which can compromise results incurring environmental impacts, decreased yield and increased operational costs. In order to assess timeliness of operations' execution, a new scheme is introduced to quantify the aptitude of farm managers to plan operations.Two criteria are presented by which the execution of operations can be evaluated as to their exploitation of a field's readiness window. A dataset containing the execution dates of spring and autumn operations on 93 fields in Iowa, USA, over two years, was considered as an example and used to demonstrate how operations' executions can be evaluated. The execution dates were compared with simulated data to gain a measure of how disparate the actual execution was from the ideal execution.The presented tool is able to evaluate spring operations better than autumn operations as required data was lacking to correctly parameterise the crop model. The evaluation criteria could be used to identify farm managers who require decisional support when planning operations, or as a means of promoting the use of sustainable farming practices.
Journal: Biosystems Engineering - Volume 144, April 2016, Pages 38–51