Detailed evaluation of safety injection tank effects on in-vessel severe accident progression in a small break LOCA without safety injection

• Safety injection tank effects on in-vessel melt progression have been evaluated.
• A best estimate simulation from initiating events to a reactor vessel failure has been carried out.
• Small break loss coolant accidents without safety injection have been simulated using SCDAP/RELAP5 computer code.
• Although the SIT actuation leads to greater hydrogen generation, the reactor vessel failure is delayed.
• The present results can provide guidelines in establishing detailed accident management procedures to mitigate severe accidents.

The effects of coolant injection into a reactor vessel by the passive actuation of SITs (Safety Injection Tanks) on the in-vessel core melt progression under a severe accident have been evaluated in an APR (Advanced Power Reactor) 1400. A best estimate simulation from initiating events of 2-in. and 3-in. break SBLOCAs (Small Break Loss Coolant Accidents) without SI (Safety Injection) to a reactor vessel failure has been carried out using the SCDAP/RELAP5 computer code in conditions with and without the passive actuation of the SITs. The SCDAP/RELAP5 results have shown that the passive coolant injection into the reactor vessel by the actuation of the SITs leads to postpone the reactor vessel failure time by 4–5 h in the SBLOCA without SI. At the time of the reactor vessel failure, 44.5% and 42.8% of the fuel rod cladding were oxidized in the 2-in. and 3-in. SBLOCAs with the actuation of the SITs, respectively. However, 37.5% and 34.6% of the fuel rod cladding were oxidized in the 2-in. and the 3-in. SBLOCAs without the actuation of the SITs, respectively. Even though the SITs are designed for a large break LOCA, their actuation is very effective on the delay of a reactor vessel failure in spite of more hydrogen generation in the SBLOCA without SI.