کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
18900 43037 2015 11 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Pressurized liquid extraction and low-pressure solvent extraction of carotenoids from pressed palm fiber: Experimental and economical evaluation
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
استخراج مایع تحت فشار و استخراج حلال کم فشار از کاروتنوئیدها از فیبر نخل فشرده: ارزیابی تجربی و اقتصادی
کلمات کلیدی
کاروتنوئیدها، هزینه تولید، استخراج سوکسله، فیبر نخل تحت فشار، استخراج مایع تحت فشار، پرکولاسیون
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی شیمی بیو مهندسی (مهندسی زیستی)
چکیده انگلیسی

In this work, a comparison of Soxhlet extraction (LPSE–SOX), percolation (LPSE–PE) and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) for the recovery of carotenoid-rich extracts from pressed palm fiber (PPF) was carried out in terms of yield, carotenoid profile and economic viability to evaluate the methods’ industrial applicability. An optimization study was performed for each extraction technique with ethanol at a solvent/feed ratio of 20. The independent variables were temperature (35–55 °C), pressure (0.1–8 MPa) and flow rate (1.6, 2.4 g/min). The results showed that the global extraction yield obtained using LPSE–SOX (96 ± 4 mg extract/g PPF d.b.) after 6 h was higher than that obtained using LPSE–PE (74 ± 5 mg extract/g PPF d.b., 35 °C, 2.4 g/min) or PLE (44 ± 3 mg extract/g PPF d.b., 55 °C, 4 MPa, 2.4 g/min) after dynamic extraction time of 17 min under optimized conditions. On the other hand, the carotenoid yield obtained using PLE (305 ± 18 μg α-carotene/g extract and 713 ± 46 μg β-carotene/g extract) was higher than the obtained by LPSE–SOX (142 ± 13 μg α-carotene/g extract and 317 ± 46 μg β-carotene/g extract). PLE technique showed the highest selectivity for carotenoids than LPSE techniques. The lowest cost of manufacturing (COM) were obtained for LPSE–PE and PLE with values of US$13.4 and US$29.2/kg extract for a 0.5 m3 vessel capacity.

Figure optionsDownload high-quality image (102 K)Download as PowerPoint slide

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Food and Bioproducts Processing - Volume 94, April 2015, Pages 90–100
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,