کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
1968785 | 1538881 | 2013 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
ObjectivesThere are no direct comparisons of blood glucose values in samples collected with barrier serum tubes (SST™) and NaF/potassium oxalate (NaF/KOx) plasma tubes. Collection of samples in SST™ tubes can offer considerable savings and specimen processing advantages for national level surveys.Design and methodsSerum and plasma samples were collected under ‘field conditions’ from a single draw of 3692 individuals participating in the Canadian Health Measures Survey. The samples were analyzed retrospectively using the VITROS GLU Slide method (glucose oxidase-based).ResultsThere was a high rate of hemolysis in the NaF/KOx tubes (86.2%) while hemolysis was infrequently observed with the SST™ tubes (2%). Comparing only blood draws where no hemolysis was observed in both tubes (n = 495; paired t-test) showed no effect of tube type on serum/plasma glucose concentrations. This was also observed when data was restricted to cases when only SST™ samples were not hemolyzed (n = 3546; paired t-test).ConclusionsThese data show that both collection tubes can be used under survey collection and processing conditions to measure glucose with our assay system with no difference in reported results.
► Glucose was measured in ‘field’ samples collected with serum and plasma tubes.
► 86% of plasma tubes were hemolyzed vs. 2% of serum separator tubes.
► No differences in measured glucose between non-hemolyzed sample pairs (n = 495).
► No difference in glucose when hemolyzed samples pairs were included (n = 3546).
Journal: Clinical Biochemistry - Volume 46, Issues 4–5, March 2013, Pages 285–288