Effectiveness of practices to reduce blood sample hemolysis in EDs: A laboratory medicine best practices systematic review and meta-analysis

ObjectiveTo complete a systematic review of emergency department (ED) practices for reducing hemolysis in blood samples sent to the clinical laboratory for testing.ResultsA total of 16 studies met the review inclusion criteria (12 published and 4 unpublished). All 11 studies comparing new straight needle venipuncture with IV starts found a reduction in hemolysis rates, [average risk ratio of 0.16 (95% CI = 0.11–0.24)]. Four studies on the effect of venipuncture location showed reduced hemolysis rates for the antecubital site [average risk ratio of 0.45 (95% CI = 0.35–0.57].ConclusionsUse of new straight needle venipuncture instead of IV starts is effective at reducing hemolysis rates in EDs, and is recommended as an evidence-based best practice. The overall strength of evidence rating is high and the effect size is substantial. Unpublished studies made an important contribution to the body of evidence. When IV starts must be used, observed rates of hemolysis may be substantially reduced by placing the IV at the antecubital site.DisclaimerThe findings and conclusions in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of the CDC.

► Seven practices were reviewed to reduce the rates of hemolysis in ED blood samples.
► New straight needle venipuncture is most effective in reducing ED hemolysis rates.
► When using catheters, placing them at the antecubital site reduces hemolysis rates.
► All other practices had insufficient evidence and could not be recommended.