A comparative study of microbubble generation by mechanical agitation and sonication

As focus on the potential applications of microbubbles increases, information about the efficiency of generation methods and their effects on the properties and stability of microbubbles is crucial in the selection of an appropriate method to generate microbubbles with the desired properties. This paper evaluates the generation efficiencies of two commonly used methods, mechanical agitation and sonication, in two surfactant systems. The results demonstrated that sonication was more effective than mechanical agitation in the generation of microbubbles in terms of higher gas hold-up, smaller bubble size, and larger interfacial area. Analysis of the changes in bubble size over time revealed that the existence of a critical diameter for the shrinkage of microbubbles. The behavior of microbubbles and the critical diameter depended on the generation method employed and the surfactant used.Industrial relevanceMicrobubble technology has gradually become accepted as a cost-effective and environmentally friendly technology with great potential within almost every field of the food industry. Selection of a suitable method to generate microbubbles with the desired properties is crucial. Mechanical agitation and sonication are two commonly used methods for microbubble generation. However, systematic information on their generation efficiency and effects on the properties of microbubbles is not available. Thus, a comparative study was conducted in this paper.