کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2144199 | 1088376 | 2006 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

SummaryOnly few studies have compared the agreement of histological lung carcinoma diagnosis of a population-based case series and an independent pathology review. We analyzed data of our population-based lung cancer case-control study to determine the agreement in the histopathological evaluation of lung cancer. Six-hundred and sixty-eight out of 1004 interviewed male and female lung cancer cases were histologically evaluated according to the 1981 WHO classification by regional pathologists and a central pathologist who was blinded to the evaluations of the regional pathologists. The observed agreement was 0.65 with κ = 0.54 (95%CI: 0.49–0.58). It was highest for small-cell carcinoma (0.94; κ = 0.82) and lower for squamous-cell carcinoma (0.81; κ = 0.58) and adenocarcinoma (0.81; κ = 0.55). Agreement was slightly higher among women than men. The observed agreement among non-smoking cases was 58% as compared to 67% heavy smoking cases. The moderate agreement for squamous-cell and adenocarcinoma complicates epidemiological studies that address these histological subtypes.
Journal: Lung Cancer - Volume 52, Issue 1, April 2006, Pages 29–36