کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2156283 | 1090453 | 2010 | 4 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Revisiting old slides - How worthwhile is it?
دانلود مقاله + سفارش ترجمه
دانلود مقاله ISI انگلیسی
رایگان برای ایرانیان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری
بیوشیمی، ژنتیک و زیست شناسی مولکولی
تحقیقات سرطان
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
![عکس صفحه اول مقاله: Revisiting old slides - How worthwhile is it? Revisiting old slides - How worthwhile is it?](/preview/png/2156283.png)
چکیده انگلیسی
Retrospective review of surgical pathology cases is a sensitive and effective method for identifying diagnostic discrepancies. As such studies from developing countries are limited, we undertook a retrospective review of 2408 surgical pathology cases (excluding skin, liver, and kidney biopsies) by two review pathologists to evaluate the quality of histopathology reporting, to identify the variations therein, and to classify them as major and minor according to the impact these would have on patient diagnosis, prognosis, or management. Diagnostic concordance was achieved in 93.1% of cases. The frequencies of overall and major differences in opinion were 6.9% and 3.4%, respectively. Major discrepancies were more common in non-neoplastic lesions than tumors. Endometrial pathologies were misdiagnosed maximally. The overall diagnostic agreement rate in the present study is in tune with those reported earlier although the frequency of major differences is higher. This is definitely a cause for concern and calls for remedial action.
ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Pathology - Research and Practice - Volume 206, Issue 6, 15 June 2010, Pages 368-371
Journal: Pathology - Research and Practice - Volume 206, Issue 6, 15 June 2010, Pages 368-371
نویسندگان
Sarla Agarwal, Neelam Wadhwa,