Investigating unsaturated fat, monensin, or bromoethanesulfonate in continuous cultures retaining ruminal protozoa. II. Interaction of treatment and presence of protozoa on prokaryotic communities1

Increasing the consistency of responses to reduce emissions of ruminal methane and nitrogenous wastes into the environment using microbial inhibitors requires an accurate assessment of microbial community profiles. In addition to direct inhibition of methanogens by feed additives, protozoa are often targeted for inhibition because their close physical association with endo- and ectosymbionts stimulates methanogenesis in the rumen. In this study, we first modified a continuous culture system to maintain a diverse protozoal population (faunated subperiod) and then selectively effluxed them without using any chemical agents (defaunated subperiod). In both subperiods, unsaturated fat (potentially inhibitory to ciliate protozoa, methanogens, and gram-positive bacteria), monensin (assumed to inhibit gram-positive bacteria), and bromoethanesulfonate (BES; a potent inhibitor of methanogens) were used to suppress the respective functional groups of microorganisms. Changes in microbial populations were determined using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis, followed by cloning and DNA sequencing of the excised bands. Neither monensin nor unsaturated fat consistently affected methanogen populations under our conditions in either the faunated or defaunated subperiods. When BES was administered, bands presumptively linked to protozoa-associated methanogens in the faunated subperiod disappeared in the defaunated subperiod. However, there was no noticeable adaptation of the sensitive methanogens to BES. The effect of dietary treatments on bacterial populations in the fermenters was harder to ascertain because of the overriding period effect caused by a different inoculum in each period. Defaunation selectively decreased the intensity of bands associated with ruminococci and clostridia but seemed to increase some Butyrivibrio and related populations. Presence of protozoa influenced both bacterial and archaeal populations, probably by selective predation, competition for substrate, or through symbiotic interactions.