کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2456785 | 1554355 | 2016 | 8 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• We investigated effects of reducing fat levels and adding guar gum powder on quality prameters in mutton goshtaba, a traditional meat product of India.
• Reducing fat level decreased TBARS value, protein carbonyls and loss of protein sulphydryl groups in low fat products.
• The sensory scores at 0.5% guar gum and 1% guar gum levels were in the range of acceptability.
• SEM results indicated that guar gum powder held more water in low fat products, due to its ability to form gel network.
The effects of reducing fat level from 20% to 10% and addition of guar gum powder at the levels of 0–1.5% on proximate composition, pH, color, lipid and protein oxidation, texture, microstructure and sensory characteristics of mutton goshtaba was investigated. Low fat goshtaba samples containing guar gum powder were significantly (P < 0.05) higher in protein and moisture contents but, lower in fat content than the high fat control. Lightness was significantly higher in high fat control (P < 0.05) and yellowness did not show any significant (P > 0.05) difference between high fat control and low fat products. The significant increase of TBARS value, protein carbonyl groups and loss of protein sulphydryl groups in high fat (20%) goshtaba reflect the more oxidative degradation of the lipids and muscle proteins than low fat treatments (P < 0.05). Hardness, gumminess, and chewiness of the high fat control were higher and springiness was lower than the low fat treatments. Microstructure observations using scanning electron microscopy shows that increase in guar gum levels lead to formation of gel net work which holds more water. Sensory evaluation indicated that decreasing fat level resulted in lower firmness, flavor intensity and overall palatability scores, but increasing juiciness. However, the low fat goshtaba containing 0.5% guar gum showed non-significant difference in overall acceptability with that of high fat control.
Journal: Small Ruminant Research - Volume 137, April 2016, Pages 169–176