کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2480388 1556188 2014 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Validation of phenol red versus gravimetric method for water reabsorption correction and study of gender differences in Doluisio’s absorption technique
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت داروسازی، سم شناسی و علوم دارویی اکتشاف دارویی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Validation of phenol red versus gravimetric method for water reabsorption correction and study of gender differences in Doluisio’s absorption technique
چکیده انگلیسی

The aim of the present study was to develop a method for water flux reabsorption measurement in Doluisio’s Perfusion Technique based on the use of phenol red as a non-absorbable marker and to validate it by comparison with gravimetric procedure. The compounds selected for the study were metoprolol, atenolol, cimetidine and cefadroxil in order to include low, intermediate and high permeability drugs absorbed by passive diffusion and by carrier mediated mechanism. The intestinal permeabilities (Peff) of the drugs were obtained in male and female Wistar rats and calculated using both methods of water flux correction. The absorption rate coefficients of all the assayed compounds did not show statistically significant differences between male and female rats consequently all the individual values were combined to compare between reabsorption methods. The absorption rate coefficients and permeability values did not show statistically significant differences between the two strategies of concentration correction. The apparent zero order water absorption coefficients were also similar in both correction procedures. In conclusion gravimetric and phenol red method for water reabsorption correction are accurate and interchangeable for permeability estimation in closed loop perfusion method.

Figure optionsDownload high-quality image (125 K)Download as PowerPoint slide

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: European Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences - Volume 62, 1 October 2014, Pages 105–110
نویسندگان
, , , ,