Stroke-related motor outcome measures: Do they quantify the neurophysiological aspects of upper extremity recovery?

SummaryVarious stroke rehabilitation outcome measures are used in clinical and research practice. Severe upper extremity paresis serves as a challenge for the selection of an appropriate outcome measure. No single measure is universally acceptable and sufficient to record the minute clinically important changes. The objectives of the present review were to explore the stroke-specific upper extremity motor outcome measures and to better understand those measures' ability to quantify upper extremity motor recovery. Seven outcome measures were selected for this review. The criteria used to select outcome measures for this review included performance-based tools that assessed the upper extremity's voluntary motor control and outcome measures which had been used for the past 10 years. A critical review that referred to motor recovery stages and volitional control was performed. The upper extremity components of each measure were compared with the neurophysiological aspects of recovery (Brunnstrom Recovery Stages) and analyzed for their clinical relevance. The concepts of minimal detectable change and minimal clinically important difference were also considered while examining the outcome measures. The findings of this review reveal that there were very few measures available to precisely assess the upper extremity motor components and volitional control. Most of the measures are functional and performance-based. Only Fugl–Meyer Assessment was found to explore the individual joint motor control as per the sequential recovery stages. Further, there is a need to develop stroke-specific upper extremity outcome measures. Scoring criteria of the acceptable measures may be modified to discern precise and progressive, but clinically significant motor changes.