کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2693156 1143506 2014 4 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Comparison of corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor after small incision lenticule extraction and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK: A prospective fellow eye study
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
مقایسه پسماند قرنیه و عامل مقاومت قرنیه پس از استخراج لين سيکل برش کوچک و لیزیک با کمک لیزر femtosecond: مطالعه آینده نگر به چشم مقابل
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی چشم پزشکی
چکیده انگلیسی

PurposeTo compare corneal hysteresis (CH) and corneal resistance factor (CRF) between eyes treated with small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) and femtosecond laser-assisted laser in situ keratomileusis (femto-LASIK).SettingBeyoğlu Eye Training and Research Hospital.DesignProspective comparative case series.MethodsSixty eyes from 30 patients with bilateral myopia or myopic astigmatism were studied. Inclusion criteria were spherical equivalent of subjective manifest refraction (SE) <10 diopters (D) and a difference ≤0.50 D between the SEs of both eyes. One eye of each patient was treated with SMILE, and the fellow eye underwent femto-LASIK. Randomization was performed using a sealed envelope system. The main outcome measures were CH and CRF measured preoperatively and postoperatively (1 and 6 months).ResultsPreoperative SE was similar in both groups (p = 0.852). CH and CRF values were reduced postoperatively in both groups compared to their corresponding preoperative values (p < 0.001). At the 6-month follow-up visit, the mean CH values in the SMILE and femto-LASIK groups were 8.95 ± 1.47 and 9.02 ± 1.27, respectively (p = 0.852), and the mean CRF values were 7.77 ± 1.37 and 8.07 ± 1.26, respectively (p = 0.380).ConclusionCH and CRF decreased after SMILE. There were no differences between SMILE and femto-LASIK treatments in postoperative CH or CRF values.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Contact Lens and Anterior Eye - Volume 37, Issue 2, April 2014, Pages 77–80
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , ,