Histochemical analysis and immunohistochemical profile of mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the conjunctiva

PurposeTo elucidate the distinct histochemical and immunohistochemical profile of mucoepidermoid carcinoma of the conjunctiva (MECC) and to determine which combination of stains is most useful in diagnosing MECC and differentiating it from squamous cell carcinoma of the conjunctiva (SCC) in cases where the clinical or cytological findings are not definitive.MethodsEight specimen of MECC from 4 patients and 4 specimens of SCC from 4 patients were examined using a variety of special stains and immunohistochemical markers. The results were then analyzed for usefulness in diagnosing MECC.ResultsThe most useful markers in diagnosing MECC and differentiating it from SCC are mucicarmine, colloidal iron, and alcian blue all with sensitivities of 88%, and a specificity of 100%; CEA with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 75%; and, mucin-1 with a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 25%, but which showed a distinct pattern of staining of MECC when compared to SCC. In our series, the sensitivity of the CK7+/CK20− combination for MECC was only 38%.ConclusionsThe most useful stains in ruling out SCC in a suspected case of MECC were shown to be mucicarmine and the glycosaminoglycan (GAG) stains. However, in cases where mucicarmine and the GAG stains are negative or difficult to interpret and there is suspicion of a diagnosis of MECC, CEA and mucin-1 may be helpful for this diagnosis. The findings of CK7+/CK20− also may be of assistance, but are not as sensitive when compared to analogous salivary gland lesions, when differentiating MECC from SCC.