کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2728666 1566733 2015 9 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Improving QST Reliability—More Raters, Tests, or Occasions? A Multivariate Generalizability Study
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم زیستی و بیوفناوری علم عصب شناسی عصب شناسی
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Improving QST Reliability—More Raters, Tests, or Occasions? A Multivariate Generalizability Study
چکیده انگلیسی


• Disturbed pain sensitivity may be a complicating factor in clinical pain states.
• Pain sensitivity can be assessed using quantitative sensory testing (QST).
• The reliability of QST was improved substantially by applying a battery of tests.
• Reliability was also improved substantially by repeated testing (occasions).
• Little was gained from testing with different raters or differentiated weighting.

The reliability of quantitative sensory testing (QST) is affected by the error attributable to both test occasion and rater (examiner) and the interactions between them. Most reliability studies account for only 1 source of error. The present study employed a fully crossed, multivariate generalizability design to account for rater and occasion variance simultaneously. Nineteen healthy volunteers were examined with a battery of 7 QST procedures 4 times on 2 occasions by 2 raters. The QST battery was composed to include a mix of different pain stimuli and response domains, including threshold, intensity, tolerance, and modulation with mechanical, thermal, and chemical stimuli. The classical test-retest and interrater reliability (.19 < intraclass correlation coefficient <.92) was in line with the literature, and generalizability analysis indicated that the universe score was generally the dominant source of variation (relative contribution = 19%, 78%). Error attributable to the interaction between study participant and occasion was also influential. Dependability coefficients indicated that a substantial increase in reliability and feasibility could be achieved by employing a composite QST battery compared to single QST procedures. Reliability was improved more by repeated testing on separate occasions than by repeated testing by different raters.PerspectivesWhen balancing reliability and feasibility, the current findings suggest that a carefully selected battery of QST procedures repeated on a few occasions may be optimal.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The Journal of Pain - Volume 16, Issue 5, May 2015, Pages 454–462
نویسندگان
, ,