کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2737750 1148095 2015 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Ablative therapies: Advantages and disadvantages of radiofrequency, cryotherapy, microwave and electroporation methods, or how to choose the right method for an individual patient?
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
درمان های انتزاعی: مزایا و معایب روش های رادیوفرکانسی، سرماخوردگی، مایکروویو و الکتروپوریشن، یا نحوه انتخاب روش مناسب برای یک بیمار خاص؟
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی انفورماتیک سلامت
چکیده انگلیسی

Several ablation techniques are currently available. Except for electroporation, all of these methods cause fatal damage at a cellular level and irreversible architectural deconstruction at a tissue level by thermal effects. Ablation of a tumor using one of these techniques, whether thermal or otherwise, requires applicators to be positioned from which the energy is delivered in situ. Some techniques, however, require several applicators to be inserted (multibipolar radiofrequency, cryotherapy and electroporation) whereas a single applicator is often sufficient with other technologies (monopolar radiofrequency and microwave). These methods are conceptually very similar but are distinguished from each other in practice through the technologies they use. It is essential to understand these differences as they influence the advantages and limitations of each of the techniques. There is no such thing as the perfect multifunctional ablation device and choice is dictated on an individual patient basis depending on the aim of treatment, which itself depends on each patient's clinical situation.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging - Volume 96, Issue 6, June 2015, Pages 617–624
نویسندگان
,