کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2757523 1567513 2015 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
A systematic review of the effects of adding neostigmine to local anesthetics for neuraxial administration in obstetric anesthesia and analgesia
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
بررسی سیستماتیک اثرات افزودن نئوستیگم به بی حسی موضعی برای تزریق نواحی مزمن در بیهوشی و درد زایمان
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی بیهوشی و پزشکی درد
چکیده انگلیسی


• We reviewed the neuraxial use of neostigmine in obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia.
• Neuraxial neostigmine as an adjuvant affords a reduction in local anaesthetic dose.
• Intrathecal but not epidural neostigmine increases the risk of nausea.
• Neuraxial neostigmine does not compromise maternal hemodynamic stability.
• Neuraxial neostigmine as an adjuvant appears to be safe for the fetus.

BackgroundDrugs used in obstetric patients must accomplish two goals: efficacy and safety for both mother and fetus. Neostigmine has been co-administered epidurally and intrathecally with local anesthetics and other adjuncts in the obstetric setting. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and incidence of adverse events related to the use of neostigmine in obstetric anesthesia.MethodsA meta-analysis of randomized-controlled human trials was conducted using the data sources Google Scholar and PubMed (updated 1 November 2014). Inclusion criteria were: random allocation to treatment; comparison of neostigmine or neostigmine with local anesthetics and/or other adjuvants versus placebo or placebo with local anesthetics and/or other adjuvants; and approval by an ethics committee.ResultsThe use of neostigmine as an adjuvant in neuraxial anesthesia is associated with a reduction in the dose of local anesthetic during labor analgesia and postoperative analgesia following cesarean section: mean reduction of local anesthetic (ropivacaine or bupivacaine) vs. control −4.08 (95% CI −6.7 to −1.5) mg/h (P=0.002). The risk of nausea was increased vs. control with intrathecal neostigmine (OR 8.99 [95% CI 4.74 to 17.05], P <0.001) but not with epidural neostigmine (OR 0.97 [95% CI 0.46 to 2.05], P=0.94). Use of neuraxial neostigmine was associated with a decrease in the risk of pruritus but there was no increase in the incidence of hypotension, dizziness or sedation and no effect on the incidence of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns or Apgar scores.ConclusionsNeuraxial administration of neostigmine significantly reduces local anesthetic consumption without serious adverse side effects to the mother or fetus. However, neostigmine is only recommended for epidural administration as intrathecal use significantly increases the incidence of maternal nausea and vomiting.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: International Journal of Obstetric Anesthesia - Volume 24, Issue 3, August 2015, Pages 237–246
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , ,