کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2760290 | 1150170 | 2013 | 7 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

ObjectiveClinical trials on cardioprotection by remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) for adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery revealed mixed results. Previous meta-analyses have been conducted and found marked heterogeneity among studies. The aim of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the factors affecting cardioprotection by remote preconditioning in adult cardiac surgery.DesignA meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.SettingUniversity hospitals.ParticipantsAdult subjects undergoing cardiac surgery.InterventionsRIPC.Measurements and Main ResultsFifteen trials with a total of 1,155 study patients reporting postoperative myocardial biomarker (CK-MB or troponin) levels were identified from PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (up to July 2012). Compared with controls, RIPC significantly reduced postoperative biomarkers of myocardial injury (standardized mean difference = −0.31, p = 0.041; heterogeneity test: I2 = 83.5%). This effect seemed more significant in valve surgery (standardized mean difference = −0.74, p = 0.002) than in coronary artery surgery (standardized mean difference = −0.23; p = 0.17). Univariate meta-regression analyses suggested that the major sources of significant heterogeneity were β-blockers (%) (coefficient = 0.0161, p = 0.022, adjusted R2 = 0.37) and volatile anesthetics (coefficient = 0.6617, p = 0.065, adjusted R2 = 0.22). These results were further confirmed in multivariate regression and subgroup analyses.ConclusionsAvailable data from this meta-analysis further confirmed the cardioprotection conferred by RIPC in adult cardiac surgery. Moreover, the cardioprotective effect may be attenuated when combined with β-blockers or volatile anesthetics.
Journal: Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia - Volume 27, Issue 2, April 2013, Pages 305–311