Effect of strut thickness on neointimal atherosclerotic change over an extended follow-up period (≥4 years) after bare-metal stent implantation: Intracoronary optical coherence tomography examination

BackgroundNeointima inside the bare-metal stents (BMSs) can transform into atherosclerotic tissue during an extended follow-up because of a persistent inflammatory reaction to the metal. We sought to investigate whether strut thickness may impact on the atherosclerotic change in neointima 4 years or more after BMS implantation using optical coherence tomography.MethodsForty-six stented lesions of 41 patients with BMS ≥4 years after implantation who underwent optical coherence tomography were enrolled in the study. The strut was defined as thin when less than 100 μm and thick when ≥100 μm. According to these criteria, stents were divided into 2 groups (thin strut n = 19, thick strut n = 27). Neointimal tissue was categorized into normal neointima, characterized by a signal-rich band without signal attenuation, or lipid-laden intima, with marked signal attenuation and a diffuse border. Intimal disruption, thrombus, and neovascularization were also evaluated.ResultsThe mean period after implantation was 98.2 ± 25.8 months in the thin-strut group and 91.1 ± 22.8 months in the thick-strut group (P = .330). Lipid-laden intima (70% vs 32%, P = .016), thin-cap fibroatheroma–like intima (59% vs 16%, P = .0056), and intimal disruption (48% vs 16%, P = .031) were observed more frequently in the thick-strut group than in the thin-strut group, but no significant difference was observed in the frequency of thrombus. Although peristrut neovascularization was a common finding in both groups (thick vs thin 81% vs 79%, P = 1.000), the frequency of intraintima neovascularization tended to be higher in the thick-strut group (67% vs 42%, P = .135).ConclusionsA thinner strut thickness may have favorable effects on neointimal atherosclerotic changes after BMS implantation.