کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2849032 1167670 2008 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
The relative value of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk score estimates in premature acute coronary syndromes
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
The relative value of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk score estimates in premature acute coronary syndromes
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundTo compare the relative value of metabolic syndrome (MetS) and cardiovascular risk score estimates in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) aged <45 years.Patients and MethodsTwo hundred consecutive patients (183 men, mean age 40.8 ± 3.5 years) presented with a first-ever ACS, and 200 age-and sex-matched controls were evaluated. Metabolic syndrome diagnostic criteria, European Risk SCORE estimation function, and the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) were assessed in all participants.ResultsThe prevalence of the MetS was significantly higher in the patients' group compared with the control group (51.5% vs 26.0%, P < .001). No subjects with a SCORE >1.0% were identified. The mean 10-year FRS for patients and controls was 13.03% ± 7.96% and 10.02 ± 8.10%, respectively (P < .001), whereas only 22.5% of ACS patients had a 10-year risk >20.0% compared with 14.5% of controls (P = .04). After controlling for potential confounders, MetS was associated with 1.93 (95% CI 1.13-3.28, P = .01) higher odds of having an ACS. Moreover, the odds had a positive association with the increasing cumulative number of MetS components. Crude and adjusted ORs for the FRS were 1.05 (95% CI 1.029-1.08, P = .001) and 0.98 (95% CI 0.92-1.05, P = NS), respectively.ConclusionMetabolic syndrome is highly associated with ACS in subjects <45 years of age and seems to be more valuable than established cardiovascular risk calculators.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: American Heart Journal - Volume 155, Issue 3, March 2008, Pages 534–540
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,