A randomized study of the safety and efficacy of fondaparinux versus placebo in the prevention of venous thromboembolism after coronary artery bypass graft surgery

BackgroundVenous thromboembolism (VTE) after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery may increase the postoperative morbidity and mortality. Therefore, we examined the current postoperative need for prophylactic antithrombotic therapy after CABG surgery.MethodsThis randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study was designed to compare the safety and efficacy of fondaparinux versus placebo in the prevention of VTE after CABG surgery. Between March 2010 and January 2013, 78 patients free from preoperative deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were enrolled, of whom 37 were randomly assigned to placebo and 41 to treatment with fondaparinux. The primary study end point was a composite, up to day 11, of (a) cumulative incidence of all VTE events, defined as symptomatic and asymptomatic DVT, and fatal and nonfatal pulmonary embolisms (efficacy end point), and (b) cumulative incidence of major hemorrhages (safety end point).ResultsA single asymptomatic DVT of a lower extremity was detected by duplex ultrasound at the time of discharge from the hospital in the placebo-treated group, and a single major postoperative hemorrhage occurred in the fondaparinux-treated group.ConclusionsThe incidence of postprocedural asymptomatic DVT in this sample of patients undergoing CABG surgery was low. The overall incidence of DVT in the control and investigational treatment groups was similar. Our results showed no benefit of prophylactic postoperative fondaparinux in this population. These findings are congruent with other published studies and provide additional support for recent recommendations not to routinely use anticoagulant prophylaxis after cardiac surgery.