Comparison of Three-Dimensional Imaging to Transesophageal Echocardiography for Preoperative Evaluation in Mitral Valve Prolapse

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is not optimally suited for recognizing which valve segments are involved in type II mitral valve dysfunction. This study was conducted to compare the diagnostic value of TEE and 3-dimensional image reconstruction (3DIR) in the assessment of Carpentier type II mitral valve lesions. In 74 patients (mean age 59 ± 13 years) with mitral regurgitation due to type II valve dysfunction, TEE and 3DIR were performed and analyzed by 2 experts before surgical repair. Leaflet scallops and commissures were displayed in short-axis en face and long-axis views. Echocardiographic results were surgically validated. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were calculated, broken down by valve segments and Barlow’s disease. Interobserver variability was also determined. Compared with TEE, 3DIR was superior with respect to sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy, although not always significantly (p <0.05). Specificity was higher for P2 lesions. The clearest advantage of 3DIR over TEE was higher sensitivity in commissural and bileaflet defects (p <0.05). Interobserver agreement on 3DIR was stronger than on TEE results (κ values 0.52 vs 0.82, p <0.0001). There were 16 disagreements (23%) on TEE but only 5 (7%) on 3DIR readings. In conclusion, the more complex the lesion, the more valuable 3DIR is compared with TEE. Before repair, 3DIR is beneficial for the evaluation and classification of the specific pathology in type II mitral valve dysfunction.