کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2905642 1173433 2006 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Understanding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Decision Making : Perspectives of Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients and Family Members
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Understanding Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Decision Making : Perspectives of Seriously Ill Hospitalized Patients and Family Members
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundTo improve communication and decision making related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), a greater understanding of the perspectives of hospitalized patients with advanced diseases and their family members are needed.MethodsIn five Canadian hospitals, we administered a face-to-face questionnaire to older inpatients with end-stage cancer and advanced medical diseases and, where possible, to one of their family members, regarding information needs, the deliberation process, and their preferred decisional role.FindingsA total of 440 of 569 patients (78%) and 160 of 176 available caregivers (91%) agreed to participate. Most patients (61%) had thought about what treatment they wanted if their heart stopped, few patients (11.3%) could describe more than two components of CPR, and only 2.7% of patients thought that the success rate of CPR was < 10%. A minority of patients (34%) had discussed CPR with their physician; 37% did not want to discuss their preferences with their doctor. Patients who felt that end-of-life issues were relevant to them were 5.5 times more likely to want a discussion with the physician regarding resuscitation (odds ratio, 5.5; 95% confidence interval, 2.5 to 12.0). The preferred role in decision making was variable, but most patients (59.7%) and family members (81.6%) preferred some degree of shared decision making that included the family member. There were no significant differences between cancer and medical patients in their preferred decisional role.InterpretationSeriously ill hospitalized patients have poor knowledge about CPR, and variable preferences for deliberation and their role in the decision-making process regarding their treatment. Strategies that improve understanding of CPR and foster discussions that involve patients, family members, and physicians in the decision-making process may improve the quantity and quality of communication and decision making about CPR.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Chest - Volume 130, Issue 2, August 2006, Pages 419–428
نویسندگان
, , , , , , ,