کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2910449 1405363 2016 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Aspiration versus no aspiration during primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Aspiration versus no aspiration during primary PCI for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveTo compare the procedural and clinical outcomes in patients with STEMI treated with PCI and manual thrombus aspiration versus PCI alone regarding mortality at 30 days (primary endpoint), TIMI flow grade, target vessel revascularization, heart failure, length of hospital stay and complications of PCI during index hospitalization (secondary endpoints). A prospective study done in the Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria Main University Hospital and ICC Hospital.Subjects160 patients in the setting of primary PCI in the duration from January 2014 to January 2015. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1: 80 patients with thrombus aspiration; Group 2: 80 patients with no thrombus aspiration.MethodsAll patients were treated with primary PCI and evaluated by echocardiography with assessment of ejection fraction. Observation to detect the occurrence of any in-hospital MACE or other PCI complications. Follow-up at 30 days for death or rehospitalization.ResultsThe peak of post procedural CK-MB (151.8 U/L vs. 131.2 U/L, P = 0.026) was significantly lower in group 2. There was no statistically significant difference between both groups as regards pre-discharge ejection fraction (45.63 ± 10.86% vs. 42.37 ± 10.14) P = 0.171. Also there were no statistically significant differences between both groups as regards TIMI flow (P = 0.403), or incidence of no reflow (P = 0.615). Stroke perforation and cardiac tamponade did not occur in both groups. Heart failure occurred in 10 patients (12.5%) in group 1, and in 12 patients (15%) in group 2 with no statistical significance. Stent thrombosis did not occur in any patient in the two groups. Rehospitalization due to cardiac cause was less in group 1 [2 patients (2.5%)] than in group 2 [6 patients (7.5%)] with no statistical significance P = 0.615. Mortality after 30 days was the same in both groups, and 4 patients (5%) died in each group P = 1.ConclusionThrombus aspiration had no additional benefit over conventional PCI regarding mortality, left ventricular function, length of hospital stay, rehospitalization due to cardiac cause and complications of PCI. Routine thrombus aspiration is not recommended especially in patients with low thrombus grade.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: The Egyptian Heart Journal - Volume 68, Issue 3, September 2016, Pages 147–152
نویسندگان
,