کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2917780 1175672 2014 8 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting Versus Combined Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Mitral Valve Repair in Treating Ischaemic Mitral Regurgitation: A Meta-analysis
ترجمه فارسی عنوان
پیوند عروق کرونر در مقابل ترکیبی پیوند عروق کرونر و پیوند دهانه دریچه میترال در درمان اصطکاک مریخ ایسکمیک: یک متاآنالیز
کلمات کلیدی
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
چکیده انگلیسی

BackgroundIschaemic mitral regurgitation (IMR) is commonly manifested after coronary artery disease, but it is still controversial as to whether coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) alone improves postoperative outcome.ObjectivesA focussed clinical question was designed and a meta-analysis of published studies was performed to identify the impact of mitral valve repair (MVR) in patients with IMR undergoing CABG versus those undergoing CABG alone.MethodsUsing the Medline database, the Cochrane clinical trials database and online clinical trial databases, we reviewed all RCTs and observational studies examining the impact of MVR and CABG in treating patients with IMR. We searched for literature published before September 2013 and earlier.ResultsThis analysis identified five studies which examined the impact of CABG alone versus combined CABG and MVR in treating patients with IMR, involving 1038 patients, with 423 patients undergoing CABG alone and 615 were performed combined CABG and MVR procedures. There was significant improvement in postoperative mitral regurgitation (MR) grade in combined group, comparing with CABG alone group (WMD: 1.34, 95% CI: 0.47 to 2.21, p = 0.003), but no significant differences were noted between the CABG plus MVR group and CABG alone group in terms of in-hospital mortality (OR: 0.84, 95% CI: 0.44 to 1.61, p = 0.60), MR grade improvement rate (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.02 to 1.66, p = 0.13), postoperative mean NYHA functional class (WMD: 0.33, 95% CI: -0.29 to 0.94, p = 0.30) and five-year survival (OR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.34 to 1.73, p = 0.53).ConclusionsCompared with CABG alone, patients who underwent combined CABG and MVR procedures showed a greater improvement in postoperative MR grade, but in terms of in-hospital mortality, MR grade improvement rate, postoperative mean NYHA functional class and five-year survival, adding MVR to CABG surgery lacks evidence to show its superiority.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Heart, Lung and Circulation - Volume 23, Issue 10, October 2014, Pages 905–912
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,