Pulmonary Vein Isolation Compared to Rate Control in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BackgroundAtrial fibrillation (AF) often coexists with congestive cardiac failure (CCF), with multiple treatment options available.MethodsSystematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials (RCT) comparing pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), pharmacological rate control, and atrioventricular junction ablation with pacemaker insertion (AVJAP) for AF, with a subgroup analysis in patients with CCF. We analysed changes in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) score, six-minute walk distance (6MWD), treadmill exercise time, and treatment complications. Results were expressed as weighted mean differences (WMD) with 95% Confidence-Intervals (95%CI).ResultsWe included seven RCT (425 participants). PVI was associated with a greater increase in LVEF (WMD+6.5%, 95%CI:+0.6to+12.5) and decrease in MLHFQ score (WMD-11.0, 95%CI:-2.6to-19.4) than pharmacological rate control in patients with CCF. PVI was also associated with a greater increase in LVEF (WMD+9.0%, 95%CI:+6.3to+11.7) and 6MWD (WMD+55.0metres, 95%CI:+34.9to+75.1), and decrease in MLHFQ score (WMD-22.0, 95%CI:-17.0to-27.0), compared to AVJAP in patients with CCF. Irrespective of cardiac function, pharmacological rate control had similar effects to AVJAP on LVEF (WMD+0.6%, 95%CI:-8.3to+9.4) and treadmill exercise time (WMD+0.5 minutes, 95%CI:-0.4to+1.3).ConclusionsOur results support the clinical implementation of PVI over AVJAP or pharmacological rate control in AF patients with CCF, who may or may not have already trialled pharmacological rhythm control.