Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting stents in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A meta-analysis of randomized trials

BackgroundRecent concerns have emerged on the potential higher risk of stent thrombosis after DES implantation, that might be even more pronounced among STEMI patients. Thus, the aim of the current study was to perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the benefits and safety of DES as compared to BMS in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for STEMI.MethodsThe literature was scanned by formal searches of electronic databases (MEDLINE and CENTRAL). We examined all completed randomized trials of DES for STEMI. The following key words were used for study selection: randomized trial, myocardial infarction, reperfusion, primary angioplasty, stenting, DES, sirolimus-eluting stent (SES), Cypher, paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES), Taxus. Information on study design, type of stent, inclusion and exclusion criteria, primary endpoint, number of patients, angiographic and clinical outcome, were extracted by two investigators. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.ResultsA total of 11 trials were included in the meta-analysis, involving 3605 patients (1888 or 52.3% randomized to DES and 1719 or 47.7% randomized to BMS).At 12 months follow-up, no significant difference was observed in mortality (4.1% vs 4.4%, OR [95% CI] = 0.91 [0.66–1.27], p = 0.59, reinfarction (3.1% vs 3.4%, OR [95% CI] = 0.85 [0.58, 1.23], p = 0.38 or stent thrombosis (1.6% vs 2.2%, OR [95% CI] = 0.76 [0.47, 1.23], p = 0.22), whereas DES were associated with a significant reduction in TVR (5.0% vs 12.6%, OR [95% CI] = 0.36 [0.28, 0.47], p < 0.0001). Safety and efficacy of DES were confirmed at 18 to 24 months follow-up (data available from 4 trials including 1178 patients).ConclusionsThis meta-analysis shows that among selected STEMI patients undergoing primary angioplasty, SES and PES, as compared to BMS, are safe and associated with a significant reduction in TVR at 1 and 2 years follow-up.