کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2936327 | 1576374 | 2007 | 9 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |

BackgroundMost studies that have analysed the effect of secondary prevention of coronary heart disease come from hospitals. Those that are community-based have been conducted mainly by nurses and follow-up was generally too short to show impact on cardiovascular events.MethodsThis is a multi-centre randomised controlled clinical trial in which patients in the intervention group received periodic postal reminders to see their general practitioner every three months during a 3-year follow-up. General practitioners reinforced healthy lifestyle recommendations to patients and reviewed drug therapies at these quarterly intervals. Patients in the control group received usual care.ResultsA total of 983 patients aged 30–79 were included. During the 3-year follow-up, 67 patients died and 156 experienced a non-fatal cardiovascular event. The event rates and all-cause mortality were similar in the intervention and control groups (24.0% and 23.5%, and 8.1% and 9.9%, respectively). Improvement in quality of life was similar in both groups. Blood pressure and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were more frequently within recommended levels in the intervention group than in controls: odds ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.05–2.51, and odds ratio 2.61, 95% confidence interval 1.32–5.18, respectively.ConclusionsIntensive secondary prevention conducted by general practitioners may improve long-term blood pressure control and increase high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with stable coronary disease.
Journal: International Journal of Cardiology - Volume 118, Issue 3, 12 June 2007, Pages 312–320