کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2941488 1177073 2012 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Maximal Hyperemia in the Assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve : Intracoronary Adenosine Versus Intracoronary Sodium Nitroprusside Versus Intravenous Adenosine: The NASCI (Nitroprussiato Versus Adenosina nelle Stenosi Coronariche Intermedie) Study
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Maximal Hyperemia in the Assessment of Fractional Flow Reserve : Intracoronary Adenosine Versus Intracoronary Sodium Nitroprusside Versus Intravenous Adenosine: The NASCI (Nitroprussiato Versus Adenosina nelle Stenosi Coronariche Intermedie) Study
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectivesThis study sought to compare increasing doses of intracoronary (IC) adenosine or IC sodium nitroprusside versus intravenous (IV) adenosine for fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessment.BackgroundMaximal hyperemia is the critical prerequisite for FFR assessment. Despite IV adenosine currently representing the recommended approach, IC administration of adenosine or other coronary vasodilators constitutes a valuable alternative in everyday practice. However, it is surprisingly unclear which IC strategy allows the achievement of FFR values comparable to IV adenosine.MethodsFifty intermediate coronary stenoses (n = 45) undergoing FFR measurement were prospectively and consecutively enrolled. Hyperemia was sequentially induced by incremental boli of IC adenosine (ADN) (60 μg ADN60, 300 μg ADN300, 600 μg ADN600), by IC sodium nitroprusside (NTP) (0.6 μg/kg bolus) and by IV adenosine infusion (IVADN) (140 μg/kg/min). FFR values, symptoms, and development of atrioventricular block were recorded.ResultsIncremental doses of IC adenosine and NTP were well tolerated and associated with fewer symptoms than IVADN. Intracoronary adenosine doses (0.881 ± 0.067, 0.871 ± 0.068, and 0.868 ± 0.070 with ADN60, ADN300, and ADN600, respectively) and NTP (0.892 ± 0.072) induced a significant decrease of FFR compared with baseline levels (p < 0.001). Notably, ADN600 only was associated with FFR values similar to IVADN (0.867 ± 0.072, p = 0.28). Among the 10 patients with FFR values ≤0.80 with IVADN, 5 were correctly identified also by ADN60, 6 by ADN300, 7 by ADN600, and 6 by NTP.ConclusionsIntracoronary adenosine, at doses higher than currently suggested, allows obtaining FFR values similar to IV adenosine. Intravenous adenosine, which remains the gold standard, might thus be reserved for those lesions with equivocal FFR values after high (up to 600 μg) IC adenosine doses.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions - Volume 5, Issue 4, April 2012, Pages 402–408
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , , ,