کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
2948688 1577318 2010 15 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Mid-Region Pro-Hormone Markers for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Acute Dyspnea : Results From the BACH (Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure) Trial
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Mid-Region Pro-Hormone Markers for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Acute Dyspnea : Results From the BACH (Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure) Trial
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectivesOur purpose was to assess the diagnostic utility of mid-regional pro–atrial natriuretic peptide (MR-proANP) for the diagnosis of acute heart failure (AHF) and the prognostic value of mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM) in patients with AHF.BackgroundThere are some caveats and limitations to natriuretic peptide testing in the acute dyspneic patient.MethodsThe BACH (Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure) trial was a prospective, 15-center, international study of 1,641 patients presenting to the emergency department with dyspnea. A noninferiority test of MR-proANP versus B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) for diagnosis of AHF and a superiority test of MR-proADM versus BNP for 90-day survival were conducted. Other end points were exploratory.ResultsMR-proANP (≥120 pmol/l) proved noninferior to BNP (≥100 pg/ml) for the diagnosis of AHF (accuracy difference 0.9%). In tests of secondary diagnostic objectives, MR-proANP levels added to the utility of BNP levels in patients with intermediate BNP values and with obesity but not in renal insufficiency, the elderly, or patients with edema. Using cut-off values from receiver-operating characteristic analysis, the accuracy to predict 90-day survival of heart failure patients was 73% (95% confidence interval: 70% to 77%) for MR-proADM and 62% (95% confidence interval: 58% to 66%) for BNP (difference p < 0.001). In adjusted multivariable Cox regression, MR-proADM, but not BNP, carried independent prognostic value (p < 0.001). Results were consistent using NT-proBNP instead of BNP (p < 0.001). None of the biomarkers was able to predict rehospitalization or visits to the emergency department with clinical relevance.ConclusionsMR-proANP is as useful as BNP for AHF diagnosis in dyspneic patients and may provide additional clinical utility when BNP is difficult to interpret. MR-proADM identifies patients with high 90-day mortality risk and adds prognostic value to BNP. (Biomarkers in Acute Heart Failure [BACH]; NCT00537628)

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Journal of the American College of Cardiology - Volume 55, Issue 19, 11 May 2010, Pages 2062–2076
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,