کد مقاله | کد نشریه | سال انتشار | مقاله انگلیسی | نسخه تمام متن |
---|---|---|---|---|
2959251 | 1178319 | 2015 | 17 صفحه PDF | دانلود رایگان |
• Emergency department (ED) treatment of acute heart failure (AHF) has evolved from a diuretics only strategy to one that considers early use of vasodilators.
• ED AHF management lacks a strong evidence base.
• Ongoing and future clinical trial collaborations between ED and HF physicians should be conducted in the ED to improve this evidence base.
Heart failure (HF) afflicts nearly 6 million Americans, resulting in one million emergency department (ED) visits and over one million annual hospital discharges. An aging population and improved survival from cardiovascular diseases is expected to further increase HF prevalence. Emergency providers play a significant role in the management of patients with acute heart failure (AHF). It is crucial that emergency physicians and other providers involved in early management understand the latest developments in diagnostic testing, therapeutics and alternatives to hospitalization. Further, clinical trials must be conducted in the ED in order to improve the evidence base and drive optimal initial therapy for AHF. Should ongoing and future studies suggest early phenotype-driven therapy improves in-hospital and post-discharge outcomes, ED treatment decisions will need to evolve accordingly. The potential impact of future studies which incorporate risk-stratification into ED disposition decisions cannot be underestimated. Predictive instruments that identify a cohort of patients safe for ED discharge, while simultaneously addressing barriers to successful outpatient management, have the potential to significantly impact quality of life and resource expenditures.
Journal: Journal of Cardiac Failure - Volume 21, Issue 1, January 2015, Pages 27–43