کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
296438 511726 2014 10 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Weld residual stresses near the bimetallic interface in clad RPV steel: A comparison between deep-hole drilling and neutron diffraction data
موضوعات مرتبط
مهندسی و علوم پایه مهندسی انرژی مهندسی انرژی و فناوری های برق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Weld residual stresses near the bimetallic interface in clad RPV steel: A comparison between deep-hole drilling and neutron diffraction data
چکیده انگلیسی


• Identification of residual stress trends across bimetallic interface in stainless clad RPV.
• Comparison between deep hole drilling (DHD – stress components in two directions) and neutron diffraction (ND – stress components in three directions).
• Results indicate that both techniques can assess the trends in residual stress across the interface.
• Neutron diffraction gives more detailed information on transient residual stress peaks.

The inner surface of ferritic steel reactor pressure vessels (RPV) is clad with strip welded austenitic stainless steel primarily to increase the long-term corrosion resistance of the ferritic vessel. The strip welding process used in the cladding operation induces significant residual stresses in the clad layer and in the RPV steel substrate, arising both from the thermal cycle and from the very different thermal and mechanical properties of the austenitic clad layer and the ferritic RPV steel. This work measures residual stresses using the deep hole drilling (DHD) and neutron diffraction (ND) techniques and compares residual stress data obtained by the two methods in a stainless clad coupon of A533B Class 2 steel. The results give confidence that both techniques are capable of assessing the trends in residual stresses, and their magnitudes. Significant differences are that the ND data shows greater values of the tensile stress peaks (∼100 MPa) than the DHD data but has a higher systematic error associated with it. The stress peaks are sharper with the ND technique and also differ in spatial position by around 1 mm compared with the DHD technique.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Nuclear Engineering and Design - Volume 274, 15 July 2014, Pages 56–65
نویسندگان
, , , , , ,