کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3008086 1181445 2013 6 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Use of impedance threshold device in conjunction with our novel adhesive glove device for ACD-CPR does not result in additional chest decompression
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Use of impedance threshold device in conjunction with our novel adhesive glove device for ACD-CPR does not result in additional chest decompression
چکیده انگلیسی

ObjectiveTo evaluate the hemodynamic effects of using an adhesive glove device (AGD) to perform active compression–decompression CPR (AGD-CPR) in conjunction with an impedance threshold device (ITD) in a pediatric cardiac arrest model.DesignControlled, randomized animal study.MethodsIn this study, 18 piglets were anesthetized, ventilated, and continuously monitored. After 3 min of untreated ventricular fibrillation, animals were randomized (6/group) to receive either standard CPR (S-CPR), active compression–decompression CPR via adhesive glove device (AGD-CPR) or AGD-CPR along with an ITD (AGD-CPR + ITD) for 2 min at 100–120 compressions/min. AGD is delivered using a fingerless leather glove with a Velcro patch on the palmer aspect and the counter Velcro patch adhered to the pig's chest. Data (mean ± SD) were analyzed using one-way ANOVA with pair wise multiple comparisons to assess differences between groups. p-Value ≤ 0.05 was considered significant.ResultsBoth AGD-CPR and AGD-CPR + ITD groups produced lower intrathoracic pressure (IttP, mmHg) during decompression phase (−13.4 ± 6.7, p = 0.01 and −11.9 ± 6.5, p = 0.01, respectively) in comparison to S-CPR (−0.3 ± 4.2). Carotid blood flow (CBF, % of baseline mL/min) was higher in AGD-CPR and AGD-CPR + ITD (respectively 64.3 ± 47.3%, p = 0.03 and 67.5 ± 33.1%, p = 0.04) as compared with S-CPR (29.1 ± 12.5%). Coronary perfusion pressure (CPP, mmHg) was higher in AGD-CPR and AGD-CPR + ITD (respectively 19.7 ± 4.6, p = 0.04 and 25.6 ± 12.1, p = 0.02) when compared to S-CPR (9.6 ± 9.1). There was no statistically significant difference between AGD-CPR and AGD-CPR + ITD groups with reference to intra-thoracic pressure, carotid blood flow and coronary perfusion pressure.ConclusionActive compression decompression delivered by this simple and inexpensive adhesive glove device resulted in improved cerebral blood flow and coronary perfusion pressure. There was no statistically significant added effect of ITD use along with AGD-CPR on the decompression of the chest.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Resuscitation - Volume 84, Issue 10, October 2013, Pages 1433–1438
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , ,