کد مقاله کد نشریه سال انتشار مقاله انگلیسی نسخه تمام متن
3008260 1181451 2013 7 صفحه PDF دانلود رایگان
عنوان انگلیسی مقاله ISI
Ischemic post-conditioning and vasodilator therapy during standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation to reduce cardiac and brain injury after prolonged untreated ventricular fibrillation
موضوعات مرتبط
علوم پزشکی و سلامت پزشکی و دندانپزشکی کاردیولوژی و پزشکی قلب و عروق
پیش نمایش صفحه اول مقاله
Ischemic post-conditioning and vasodilator therapy during standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation to reduce cardiac and brain injury after prolonged untreated ventricular fibrillation
چکیده انگلیسی

Aim of the studyWe investigated the effects of ischemic postconditioning (IPC) with and without cardioprotective vasodilatory therapy (CVT) at the initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on cardio-cerebral function and 48-h survival.MethodsProspective randomized animal study. Following 15 min of ventricular fibrillation, 42 Yorkshire farm pigs weighing an average of 34 ± 2 kg were randomized to receive standard CPR (SCPR, n = 12), SCPR + IPC (n = 10), SCPR + IPC + CVT (n = 10), or SCPR + CVT (n = 10). IPC was delivered during the first 3 min of CPR with 4 cycles of 20 s of chest compressions followed by 20-s pauses. CVT consisted of intravenous sodium nitroprusside (2 mg) and adenosine (24 mg) during the first minute of CPR. Epinephrine was given in all groups per standard protocol. A transthoracic echocardiogram was obtained on all survivors 1 and 4 h post-ROSC. The brains were extracted after euthanasia at least 24 h later to assess ischemic injury in 7 regions. Ischemic injury was graded on a 0–4 scale with (0 = no injury to 4 ≥50% neural injury). The sum of the regional scores was reported as cerebral histological score (CHS). 48 h survival was reported.ResultsPost-resuscitation left ventricular ejection (LVEF) fraction improved in SCPR + CVT, SCPR + IPC + CVT and SCPR + IPC groups compared to SCPR (59% ± 9%, 52% ± 14%, 52% ± 14% vs. 35% ± 11%, respectively, p < 0.05). Only SCPR + IPC and SCPR + IPC + CVT, but not SCPR + CVT, had lower mean CHS compared to SCPR (5.8 ± 2.6, 2.8 ± 1.8 vs. 10 ± 2.1, respectively, p < 0.01). The 48-h survival among SCPR + IPC, SCPR + CVT, SCPR + IPC + CVT and SCPR was 6/10, 3/10, 5/10 and 1/12, respectively (Cox regression p < 0.01).ConclusionsIPC and CVT during standard CPR improved post-resuscitation LVEF but only IPC was independently neuroprotective and improved 48-h survival after 15 min of untreated cardiac arrest in pigs.

ناشر
Database: Elsevier - ScienceDirect (ساینس دایرکت)
Journal: Resuscitation - Volume 84, Issue 8, August 2013, Pages 1143–1149
نویسندگان
, , , , , , , , , ,